Biden Offers Nothing But More War, Austerity and White Supremacy – Without Trump

Source: Black Agenda Report

Glen Ford, BAR Executive Editor 27 Aug 2020

Biden Offers Nothing But More War, Austerity and White Supremacy – Without Trump

Biden Offers Nothing But More War, Austerity and White Supremacy – Without Trump

Biden is an unreconstructed racist and warmonger who has been in the forefront of austerity, and Harris is a party hack and mass Black incarcerator who became a prosecutor with police union endorsement.

Biden’s acceptance speech put forward not one word that hinted at programmatic change on racial matters.”

The corporate Democrats are once again running as the Not-Trump Party, the second consecutive election in which they have succeeded in suppressing every issue except the fitness for office of one very wretched man.  The only way a party wholly-owned by oligarchs can deflect attention from its own culpability in dragooning its constituents into a Race to the Bottom amid never ending war, is to set up a straw man to be knocked down, leaving the machinery of racial capitalism and armed-to-the-teeth imperialism intact — Hillary Clinton’s gambit in 2016. 

She lost, but the oligarchy did just fine under the Orange Menace, as stocks and profits skyrocketed. In the interim, however, popular demands for relief from the duopoly’s bipartisan regime of austerity and war escalated, and a Black-led movement took to the streets in unprecedented numbers.  China’s economy, which had already eclipsed the United States in purchasing power parity , continued to roar ahead, as Beijing countered U.S. military encirclement with the most ambitious multinational infrastructure project in world history: the Belt and Road initiative, formerly the New Silk Road. 

“Popular demands for relief from the duopoly’s bipartisan regime of austerity and war escalated, and a Black-led movement took to the streets in unprecedented numbers.”

With the bulk of the U.S. ruling class and their servants in the national security apparatus now aligned with Democrats, Trump was made the scapegoat for both Black anger at institutional racial oppression and for imperial decline. Black Democratic elected officials played their assigned role, waving American flags as they pretended that only Trump stood in the way of racial “healing” in a nation born of native genocide and Black enslavement.  Recent history was quickly rewritten, positing the rise of Trump as the demon who taunted Blacks into resurrecting a grassroots movement that had been dormant for two generations, when in fact the Black Lives Matter phenomenon arose to demolish a bipartisan Mass Black Incarceration regime under his predecessor, the First Black President.

Having strangled the anti-austerity (but loyal imperialist) internal challenge from Bernie Sanders, the oligarch-aligned Democrats and their media chose Joe Biden as front man: a political hack with impeccable corporate credentials and an architect of the “New Jim Crow” and white northern massive resistance to Black urban intrusion. His Black female running mate is a pure product of the corporate Democratic machine, who launched her electoral career with the endorsement of police unions. 

But neither of them is Trump, and that’s all that matters.

“Trump was made the scapegoat for both Black anger at institutional racial oppression and for imperial decline.”

With Biden, the “white working class” champion carrying the corporate torch, there will be no talk of baskets of “deplorables” – because he is a certified denizen of the basket.  Rather, Biden promised in his acceptance speech to “choose a different path, and together, take this chance to heal, to be reborn, to unite. A path of hope and light.”

Trump is darkness, the Democrats are light – ad nauseum for 3,000-plus meaningless words. 

Biden acknowledges that the U.S. responded to the Covid-19 epidemic with “the worst performance of any nation on Earth.” But it was all the fault of the unmasked man, Trump. The methodical privatization and shrinkage of the public health system, a thoroughly bipartisan policy, had nothing to do with mass death. The austerity regime, of which Biden is a founding member, which apportions health care based on race and class, is blameless. There can be no true national health care system absent a single payer program, but Biden vowed to veto Medicare for all if it ever crosses his presidential desk. Biden joins Trump in scapegoating China for the coronavirus, promising “we will never again be at the mercy of China and other foreign countries in order to protect our own people.” Yet, he is the light.

“There can be no true national health care system absent a single payer program, but Biden vowed to veto Medicare for all.”

Biden assures us that his “economic plan is all about jobs, dignity, respect, and community” — a claim that flies in the face of his history as budget-slasher. As journalist Branko Marcetic writes, “Biden is uniquely susceptible to budget-cutting dogma. He quickly became a fiscal hawk after entering the Senate in 1972, introducing  the Federal Spending Control Act five years later to potentially put all federal spending programs on the chopping block, and musing that Reagan’s 1980 victory was ‘more consistent with the budgetary thrust that a guy like me … has been going for.’”

In his speech, Biden called Social Security a “a sacred obligation, a sacred promise made.” But, again citing Marcetic, Biden has proposed to means-test Social Security and, from the 1980s on “has called for and introduced legislation aimed at slashing federal spending, including by cutting Medicare and Social Security.” Vice-President Biden was point man for Barack Obama’s partially consummated “Grand Bargain” with Republicans, during which the administration offered four trillion dollars in cuts, mostly to social programs, including Social Security – a program that Obama put on the cutting table, along with Medicaid and “all other entitlements” at the very beginning of his presidency.

Biden has always been a soldier for austerity, a war against the poor. Why should anyone believe he has reversed course in his old age? 

“Biden was point man for Barack Obama’s partially consummated ‘Grand Bargain’ with Republicans.”

Biden is an unreconstructed racist, as is proven every time he makes a remark even remotely related to race. His acceptance speech put forward not one word that hinted at programmatic change on racial matters. However, he did mention the name of George Floyd’s daughter, and seemed to think that John Lewis’ ghost will cause us all to “see the light.”

But Russia shall be consigned to darkness, along with Trump. Biden repeated the wholly unsubstantiated and historically bizarre charge that Moscow put “bounties on the heads of American soldiers” in Afghanistan, despite Russia’s longtime and invaluable assistance to maintain the U.S. presence in that country. 

War. Austerity and White Supremacy are all that Biden/Harris offer – but without Trump. If that’s enough for you, then say “Hallelujah” — and then tighten your belts and pass the ammunition. 

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com

COMMENTS?

Please join the conversation on Black Agenda Report’s Facebook page at http://facebook.com/blackagendareport

1 thought on “Biden Offers Nothing But More War, Austerity and White Supremacy – Without Trump

  1. Dear Readers,

    I am generally in support of Glen Ford’s and Black Agenda Report’s analysis of the Biden-Harris ticket. In other words, I accept the view that Capitalism, Racism, Imperialism are Bipartisan in the US. Consequently, I also embrace the view which I believe is logically embedded in the former that wars, austerity policies and white supremacy are also Bipartisan and are derived from the former more dominant bipartisanship and that is so dominant in the American body politic for several generations lasting for several decades.

    Thus, Glen Ford’s and Black Agenda Report’s analysis is politically credible in several fundamental ways including their assessment of the Biden-Harris ticket.

    However, I also believe that there is a deficiency at the core of the Black Agenda Report’s analysis in that it is non-commital in terms of charting a course forward in terms of mobilizing voters against Trump’s anti-social, anti-climate and pro inequality and anti immigrant policies. The latter is particularly important given that the progressive movement in the US has no viable presidential candidate in the race precisely because organizationally, politically and ideologically, the progressive movement in the US is fractured and disoriented. The latter, I believe in large measure despite the ongoing explosion of anti-racist and anticapitalist protests spearheaded by the Black Lives Matter Movement and others across the US.

    So for me, though I share so much of Glen Ford’s analysis regarding the Biden-Harris ticket, Trump and the Republicans and the stranglehold of the political duopoly over the US political landscape, I believe that the Biden-Harris ticket relative to the openly racist Trump, anti-climate, anti health care, sexist and xenophobic policies of Trump, despite the credible arguments against the Biden-Harris ticket, my vote will be casted for the Biden-Harris ticket for at least two reasons. First, because though the ticket is problematic in several ways, I believe that the Democratic ticket is probably more likely to embrace albeit inconsistently more progressive reforms on the climate, health care, race relations, immigration, prisons, income-wealth inequalities among others.

    Clearly, I don’t expect the Biden-Harris ticket to initiate these reforms independent of organized mass movements though unlike Trump who has neofascist and authoritarian tendencies and will resist mass struggles I believe that the Biden-Harris ticket is less likely not to capitulate to mass struggles. There are several reasons for the latter’s openness” to mass pressure one of which is its own political survival relative to Trump and the Republicans who are overwhelmingly under the influence of of powerful white racists who believe in suppressing not only Black voters but even white voters given the changing demographics in the country. The other reason is that there is no politically viable candidate because of the inherent weaknesses in the national progressive movement. Had there been a viable radical candidate in the presidential race, my vote would clearly go to such a candidate. Further, my vote for the Biden-Harris ticket for all the reasons already cited is more a vote against Trump than it is for the Democratic Party’s ticket.

    Finally, then for me the critical question at this historical juncture in the US is this: which of the two tickets Biden-Harris corporate controlled and corporate led will provide a more favorable set of opportunities for working and poor people to organize labor unions and other civic, social and political organizations and to fight for their class interests, climate protection, the protection of the vote, against racism, against income-wealth inequalities, against the ravages of COVID19, gay rights, against wars and military adventures abroad, gender justice among others? Is it Biden-Harris or Trump-Pence? The answer is clearly the former though as indicated, we will have to fight like hell to win all concessions from this democratic ticket given the powerful monopoly capitalist and financial interests that they are aligned with against working and poor people!

    Peace ☮️

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s